Testing A New Attrition Nonresponse Adjustment Method For SIPP

نویسندگان

  • Ralph E. Folsom
  • Michael B. Witt
چکیده

1. Introduction While unit or questionnaire nonresponse can seriously degrade the quality of any survey, nonparticipation is particularly threatening to a longitudinal survey like the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). To minimize the potential biasing effects of second and subsequent wave attrition from SIPP panels, staff at the Census Bureau perform weight adjustments. These adjustments are designed to make the self-selected subsample of longitudinal respondents more representative of the initial wave one sample. The Bureau's SIPP weight adjustments take the form of post-stratum or weighting class specific multipliers applied to the wave one base sample weight. The associated weighting classes are defined by collapsing cells in a multi-way cross classification of categorical variables until each resulting cell satisfies two conditions: cells are collapsed until the sample size and the estimated response propensity are greater than predefined thresholds. The Bureau funded research project reported here (Folsom and Witt, 1994) tests a new nonresponse adjustment methodology recently developed at the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) (Folsom, 1991). This new method uses weight adjustment multipliers defined at the person level. These multipliers are created by modeling a sample person's response propensity using constrained forms of either a logistic or exponential model. This nonresponse adjustment methodology was tested on data from the 1987 SIPP panel. The goal of this project was to develop a new SIPP nonresponse adjustment that would reduce the attrition bias in cross sectional and longitudinal estimates derived from the survey. 2. Overview of the 1987 SIPP The 1987 SIPP was a longitudinal household, panel survey designed to collect demographic and economic data on all household occupants over a 28 month data collection period. The initial sample of households was divided into four rotation groups, and data was collected from respondents in each rotation group every four months. Each four month data collection period is referred to as a sample wave; consequently, the 1987 SIPP had seven waves of data collection. During each interview, demographic and economic data was collected by month, for the four previous months. By carefully matching waves of data collection, rotation groups and reference months one can see that monthly data is available for all four rotation groups for 25 continuous reference months and monthly data for subsets of rotation groups are available for an additional 6 months. The SIPP was designed to be a ongoing survey with new, seven or eight wave …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Exploiting Computer Automation to Improve the Interview Process and Increase Survey Cooperation

Couper (2002) outlines the “challenges and opportunities” of recent and stillemerging technological developments on the conduct of survey research. This paper focuses on one such development – the use of computer-assisted survey instruments in place of paper-andpencil questionnaires – and it focuses on one particular opportunity which this development presents: the ability to improve efficiency...

متن کامل

Asset Ownership Screening Procedures in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Methods Panel

Reducing nonresponse and attrition is a primary goal of the SIPP Methods Panel; a key strategy toward that goal is the design of a more efficient questionnaire. This paper describes an experiment which tests new questionnaire efficiencies for SIPP's asset ownership questions. The standard SIPP questionnaire includes a 12-question battery about different types of assets, some of which (for examp...

متن کامل

On the Formation of Weighting Adjustment Cells for Unit Nonresponse

1. Introduction Unit nonresponse occurs when entire interviews are missing due to noncontact of a sampled individual or refusal to answer the questionnaire. Weighting is a standard method of unit nonresponse adjustment and is a natural extension of weighting for unequal probabilities of selection. However, unlike the sample weight, the nonresponse rate is usually unknown and must be estimated. ...

متن کامل

1985: Compensating for Wave Nonresponse in the 1979 Isdp Research Panel

The choice between weighting adjustments and imputation for handling missing survey data is generally straightforward: as a rule, weighting adjustments are used for total nonresponse and imputation is used for item nonresponses. There are, however, several situations where the choice is debatable. In general, these are situations of what might be termed partial nonresponse, where some data are ...

متن کامل

Adjusting for attrition in event-history analysis.

"This paper will investigate the issue of weighting for panel attrition in event-history models by comparing alternative treatments of sampling weights in a divorce model for members of the 1986 [U.S.] Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Three distinct weighting procedures are compared. These are based on (1) the initial selection probability weights; (2) the 1986 SIPP panel weig...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002